Which is more exciting pick At Current Price level? – YUM! Brands, Inc. (YUM), AAC Holdings, Inc. (AAC)

The shares of YUM! Brands, Inc. have increased by more than 25.40% this year alone. The shares recently went down by -2.16% or -$2.54 and now trades at $115.27. The shares of AAC Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:AAC), has slumped by -50.68% year to date as of 09/10/2019. The shares currently trade at $0.69 and have been able to report a change of 29.07% over the past one week.

The stock of YUM! Brands, Inc. and AAC Holdings, Inc. were two of the most active stocks on Tuesday. Investors seem to be very interested in what happens to the stocks of these two companies but do investors favor one over the other? We will analyze the growth, profitability, risk, valuation, and insider trends of both companies and see which one investors prefer.

Next 5Y EPS Growth: 14.61% versus 20.00%

When a company is able to grow consistently in terms of earnings at a high compound rate have the highest likelihood of creating value for its shareholders over time. Analysts have predicted that YUM will grow it’s earning at a 14.61% annual rate in the next 5 years. This is in contrast to AAC which will have a positive growth at a 20.00% annual rate. This means that the higher growth rate of AAC implies a greater potential for capital appreciation over the years.

Profitability and Returns

Growth alone cannot be used to see if the company will be valuable. Shareholders will be the losers if a company invest in ventures that aren’t profitable enough to support upbeat growth. In order for us to accurately measure profitability and return, we will be using the EBITDA margin and Return on Investment (ROI), which balances the difference in capital structure. YUM has an EBITDA margin of 49.79%, this implies that the underlying business of YUM is more profitable. The ROI of YUM is 90.10% while that of AAC is -8.30%. These figures suggest that YUM ventures generate a higher ROI than that of AAC.

Cash Flow

The value of a stock is ultimately determined by the amount of cash flow that the investors have available. Over the last 12 months, YUM’s free cash flow per share is a positive 0.

Liquidity and Financial Risk

The ability of a company to meet up with its short-term obligations and be able to clear its longer-term debts is measured using Liquidity and leverage ratios. The current ratio for YUM is 0.90 and that of AAC is 0.20. This implies that it is easier for YUM to cover its immediate obligations over the next 12 months than AAC.


YUM currently trades at a forward P/E of 27.15, and a P/S of 6.42 while AAC trades at a P/B of 0.39, and a P/S of 0.07. This means that looking at the earnings, book values and sales basis, YUM is the cheaper one. It is very obvious that earnings are the most important factors to investors, thus analysts are most likely to place their bet on the P/E.

Analyst Price Targets and Opinions

The mistake some people make is that they think a cheap stock has more value to it. In order to know the value of a stock, there is need to compare its current price to its likely trading price in the future. The price of YUM is currently at a -3.06% to its one-year price target of 118.91. Looking at its rival pricing, AAC is at a -84.67% relative to its price target of 4.50.

When looking at the investment recommendation on say a scale of 1 to 5 (1 being a strong buy, 3 a hold, and 5 a sell), YUM is given a 2.50 while 1.00 placed for AAC. This means that analysts are more bullish on the outlook for YUM stocks.

Insider Activity and Investor Sentiment

Short interest or otherwise called the percentage of a stock’s tradable shares currently being shorted is another data that investors use to get a handle on sentiment. The short ratio for YUM is 3.60 while that of AAC is just 8.95. This means that analysts are more bullish on the forecast for YUM stock.


The stock of AAC Holdings, Inc. defeats that of YUM! Brands, Inc. when the two are compared, with AAC taking 5 out of the total factors that were been considered. AAC happens to be more profitable, generates a higher ROI, has higher cash flow per share, higher liquidity and has a lower financial risk. When looking at the stock valuation, AAC is the cheaper one on an earnings, book value and sales basis. Finally, the sentiment signal for AAC is better on when it is viewed on short interest.